Turns Out I Wasn’t Difficult: Reclaiming Emotional Safety
- Jane Alice Davidson

- 3 days ago
- 2 min read

For years, I carried the belief that I was “too much.”
Too intense.
Too inquisitive.
Too emotional.
Too direct.
If I asked for clarification, I was “pushing.”
If I wanted a deeper conversation, I was “difficult.”
If I got angry, I was “unstable.”
If I got quiet, I was “withholding.”
There wasn’t a version of me that didn’t make someone uncomfortable.
So I edited myself.
I softened.
I reworded.
I padded my truths with disclaimers.
And then wondered why I always felt disconnected, even in relationships that were supposed to feel close.
But something shifted.
I started having conversations with people who didn’t flinch.
People who welcomed depth and matched my curiosity.
People who weren’t threatened by emotion but understood it as evidence that I’m alive, present, and paying attention.
And that’s when I realized:
I wasn’t too much.
I was just misplaced.
The people who called me difficult weren’t afraid of me.
They were afraid of what my questions might reveal about them.
Now I understand myself differently:
My anger is boundary-setting in motion.
My questions are reaching for clarity.
My directness is not cruelty, it’s care without performance.
What once made me “hard to handle” now makes me safe to trust.
Reclaiming emotional safety began with recognizing that my direct questions were not flaws but signs of clarity and connection.
A Slice of Humble Pie
Being misunderstood doesn’t mean you’re wrong; it may mean you were surrounded by people unequipped for your truth.
Reflection
What parts of you were labeled “too much,” and how might those same traits actually be forms of strength?
Where have you mistaken emotional intelligence for a flaw simply because others couldn’t meet you there?
Affirmation
I do not shrink to soothe someone else’s discomfort. My clarity is not aggression. My boundaries are not cruel. My questions are a form of love.




Comments